The most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame: Right fielders
The most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame: Center fielders
The most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame: Left fielders
The most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame: Shortstops
网烧饼哥加速器
Bob Onstott 111 on If You Ask Roberto Clemente, Don Hoak Was the Pirates 1960 MVP
Google 文件极客 - 谷歌官方安卓垃圾清理应用 Files Go 中国 ...:2021-6-4 · Google 文件极客与 Files Go 在功能和界面上几乎完全一致，该 APP 可众通过机器学习，帮你快速清理垃圾回收空间，避免垃圾累积导致手机运行速度变慢变卡。它的文件管理器功能也可让你更快地搜索到需要的文件，并且可众无线传输文件快速共享给他人。 on Kaline vs. Yaz
Ron Porter on Chicken on the Hill with Will
Sal Tartaglia on The 1954 World Series and the Vanishing Bob Feller
Mike Munson on Former Sacramento Solons owner, Fred David, dead at 100
网烧饼哥加速器
网烧饼哥加速器
网烧饼哥加速器
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
iphone上如何使用谷歌
网烧饼哥加速器
ios用什么上谷歌
It’s been awhile since I posted here about landing a big interview, though I scored one recently, getting to spend almost an hour on the phone with 87-year-old Los Angeles Dodgers great Maury Wills. It’s my pleasure to share the write-up, which dropped at Sports Illustrated’s website on Monday.
In the lead-up to the interview, I did a bit of research around Wills’ impact on the game, which has been a source of some debate in the baseball community. The conventional wisdom in baseball has been that Wills brought the steal back into the game in the early 1960s, when he led the league one season after another and broke Ty Cobb’s single-season record in 1962 when he swiped 104 bags.
Some researchers have questioned this, though, bringing up that Hall of Famer and Chicago White Sox shortstop Luis Aparicio might deserve the real credit, having begun to swipe more bases in the late 1950s. I’ve seen Willie Mays get some of the credit, too.
Honestly, either crediting Wills entirely or dismissing his impact has seemed an oversimplification to me. So I found another way to look at it.
Searching the ever-reliable Baseball-Reference.com, I found that stolen base opportunities are tracked for players from about 1920 on. (For anyone who wants to check it out, it’s in the Advanced Stats section for batting, listed as “Baserunning & Misc. Stats.” Here’s Wills’ section for this.) The importance of analyzing opportunities: I figured if there was a true stolen base revolution, players would be stealing at a higher percentage of their total opportunities.
I wasn’t sure how to get total opportunity numbers for every season, so I found a compromise to create two control groups. I made lists of everyone who stole at least 30 bases from 1947-61 and 1963-77. This way, I figured I’d get the 15 seasons before and the 15 seasons after Wills’ iconic 1962 season, to see how much of a shift occurred.
As a preface to what follows, I’ll note that when Wills stole 104 bases in 1962, he made 117 attempts out of a total of 348 opportunities, giving him an attempt percentage of 33.6 percentage. This might sound inconsequential or wonkish, but it was a markedly higher rate than anyone had done the 15 preceding seasons.
Here are the 20 30-stolen base seasons from 1947 through 1961, organized by attempt percentage:
Bottom line, though, it’s clear that a significant shift in baseball occurred following the 1962 season. To not credit Wills at least somewhat with this shift seems absurd.
网烧饼哥加速器
Embed from Getty Images
This is the final entry of a nine-part series, based on a poll of 425 respondents. Here are results for pitchers, catchers, first basemen, second basemen, third basemen, shortstops, left fielders, and center fielders.
It’s probably no surprise that in a recent survey I conducted via the website Qualtrics, having 425 respondents vote on the most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame at each position, Ichiro Suzuki proved one of the three top vote recipients along with Albert Pujols and Derek Jeter.
Like Pujols and Jeter, Suzuki looks like a future no-doubt Hall of Famer, arriving from Japan at 27 and quickly becoming baseball’s best contact hitter. While Suzuki faded considerably over the last half of his big league career as he began to approach 40, his first 10 years stateside were a beautiful thing, good for a .331 batting average, an American League Most Valuable Player Award, and an astonishing 2,224 hits.
Now that I think of it a little more, I could actually see some people being miffed Walker didn’t overtake Suzuki in the results. By sabermetrics, Walker is the superior candidate for the entirety of his career, with 72.7 WAR and 48.3 Wins Above Average to Suzuki’s 59.3 WAR and 23.8 WAA. Granted, lifetime sabermetrics are a little unfair to Suzuki, since they don’t incorporate useful time he spent as a player in Japan. Even just comparing their age-27 to age-36 seasons, though, Walker comes out on top by advanced stats.
Still, these results seem like a bit of a coup for Walker, who’s entering his tenth and final year on the Baseball Writers Association of America ballot for Cooperstown and needs to jump just over 20 percent for his plaque. (It looks doable, given leaps made by Edgar Martinez, Tim Raines, and Mike Mussina in recent years.) A more detailed breakdown of the voting seems to bode pretty well for Walker, too, with the former Colorado Rockies great a consensus second choice and 79.5 percent of voters ranking him among their top four.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Abreu
9
17
39
50
74
74
74
33
31
24
Bonds
14
13
16
31
39
77
83
87
42
23
Evans
14
33
69
60
69
64
49
46
16
5
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
19
29
47
27
38
46
50
50
46
73
Oliva
8
14
24
37
43
32
52
76
105
34
iphone上如何使用谷歌
6
25
72
78
68
50
36
29
51
10
Smith
2
9
13
24
26
39
41
61
86
124
Sosa
8
44
62
53
39
26
27
35
31
100
Suzuki
279
81
20
16
3
3
3
3
10
7
Walker
66
160
63
49
26
14
10
5
7
25
Total
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
Other thoughts: This was another deep position and I wasn’t able to get a few players here that I would’ve liked. The most glaring omission was Dave Parker, who I really should’ve found space for. For older players, Tommy Henrich and Carl Furillo each have their supporters. I also am interested to see how Juan Gonzalez and Joe Carter might’ve done on the ballot, though I suspect they would’ve been near the bottom. They just aren’t good candidates by sabermetrics. In fact, Carter’s case by advanced stats is kind of garish, with -10.8 WAA.
I don’t really know either who those men could’ve displaced. Already, I freed up space on the ballot by having Shoeless Joe Jackson, who split his career between left and right, go on the left field ballot. I suppose if I field this again, Reggie Smith could be on the center field ballot, which was weaker.
A few other things to share here, courtesy of Qualtrics filters:
The 48 voters who ranked Roger Maris first or second gave Mark McGwire an average ranking of 5.02 as opposed to his overall ranking of 5.17, not much of a difference. Their responses deviated sharply for Barry Bonds, though, with these voters ranking Bonds 3.9 against his overall average of 2.61.
The 43 voters who ranked Bobby Bonds in the top three gave his son an average ranking of 2.60. I wondered if Barry might do worse with voters who ranked his father worse, as if the Bonds name might elicit a certain response in voters or if certain voters skimming quickly might’ve thought they were voting for Barry. Alas, there wasn’t a correlation, with Barry receiving an average ranking of 2.35 from the 152 voters who rated his father 8 or worse here.
That said, this officially wraps up this series. Thanks to everyone who voted and everyone who’s been reading. It’s my hope that this series can spur additional research.
Just getting caught up? Here are results for pitchers, catchers, first basemen, second basemen, iphone如何上谷歌, shortstops, left fielders, and center fielders.
网烧饼哥加速器
Embed from Getty Images
I recently asked 425 respondents to rank the most-deserving players at each position not in the Hall of Fame, ranging from 1 for most-deserving to 10 for least-deserving. With respect to Carlos Beltran, the results for center field might have surprised me most.
Again, I mean no disrespect to Beltran, who recently wrapped an outstanding career and compares favorably to numerous Hall of Famers. My friend Adam Darowski ios用什么上谷歌 into his Hall of Stats and ranks the former Kansas City Royals standout in front of Ernie Banks, Andre Dawson, and Roberto Alomar, among others. Still, I didn’t expect such a clear divide here between Beltran and the other nine center fielders on the ballot.
That said, having previously presented results for pitchers, catchers, iphone如何上谷歌, second basemen, third basemen, 怎么在苹果上登录谷歌, and left fielders, here’s how voting went for center fielders.
Q8 – Rank the following center fielders, ranging from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving
Player
Average ranking
ios用什么上谷歌
2.34
ios用什么上谷歌
iphone上如何使用谷歌
Kenny Lofton
4.46
Dale Murphy
iphone上如何使用谷歌
Jim Edmonds
4.67
iphone如何上谷歌
6.32
Curt Flood
6.47
Cesar Cedeno
6.63
Johnny Damon
iphone如何上谷歌
ios用什么上谷歌
8.10
[From a survey of 425 respondents, fielded via Qualtrics]
Perhaps Beltran benefits from having a recently-completed body of work. I also wonder if Beltran might’ve dropped a little in the results had I gone with my initial instinct to include Mike Trout as a candidate. I decided against it because Trout’s only in his ninth season. Still, somehow just days past his 28th birthday, Trout’s 71.7 WAR is already better than any man here. It’s also better than Willie Mays, Mickey Mantle, Ty Cobb, or any other center fielder in baseball history through their first nine seasons.
A more detailed breakdown of the voting shows that Beltran wasn’t a consensus first pick. He got the fourth-fewest first-place votes of a position winner after Adrian Beltre (46), Joe Mauer (80), and Lou Whitaker (161), with Andruw Jones and Dale Murphy each siphoning a fair number of votes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Beltran
198
89
58
29
17
16
9
3
1
5
苹果7上谷歌加速软件
2
25
19
35
49
59
66
62
68
40
Damon
1
6
20
17
44
57
63
73
67
77
Edmonds
20
59
53
86
71
49
36
25
17
9
Flood
36
22
25
21
32
46
44
75
72
52
Jones
52
65
80
65
41
42
30
26
18
6
Lofton
32
73
72
71
47
29
37
34
23
7
Murphy
65
60
53
45
43
41
44
43
25
6
Williams
16
21
35
31
49
57
65
38
76
37
iphone上如何使用谷歌
3
5
10
25
32
29
31
46
58
186
Total
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
As I’ve been saying repeatedly through these posts, I’m struck again about the parity in the results between Jones, Murphy, and Kenny Lofton and Jim Edmonds. I wouldn’t really have a problem with any of these men being enshrined. Murphy’s long been a personal favorite. Jones, Lofton, and Edmonds are all underrated and, unfortunately, look destined to be for years to come.
With the help of filters via Qualtrics, here are some more findings:
Generally, the more favorable a view that a voter held of Curt Flood — a standout center fielder for the St. Louis Cardinals before he sacrificed his career challenging the Reserve Clause — the dimmer a view the voter tended to take of Clemens and Bonds. Because of Flood having such an unusually-wide distribution of votes, we can break it down a little further (rounding to the nearest tenth of a percent for Bonds and Clemens’ totals):
Flood
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Bonds
3.6
4.2
2.5
2.7
2.6
3.3
2.5
2.3
2.4
1.6
Clemens
3.3
3.9
2
3.3
2.2
3.3
2.1
2
2.3
1.6
Votes
36
22
25
21
32
46
44
75
72
52
Meanwhile, Bonds and Clemens fared better with the 282 voters who ranked Beltran, Jones, or Lofton first, with Bonds receiving an average ranking of 1.8 from these voters and Clemens receiving an average ranking from them of 1.84.
Beyond this, there isn’t too much else to say. If I field this survey again in the future, I might swap out Johnny Damon and Jim Wynn for Trout and either Reggie Smith (who was on a packed right field ballot) or Fred Lynn. It’s interesting to see a bit more support up top for Cesar Cedeno and Bernie Williams, though there’s a pretty clear division with them as well.
apple id强制激活程序下载|apple id强制激活程序下载_快猴 ...:2021-11-25 · 这是apple id强制激活程序，国外的苹果id锁解锁工具，首先锁定屏幕进入dfu刷机模式。在电脑端下iTunes，连接手机，按住home和开机键10秒，松开开机键，home别松，等电脑上出现提示，然后根据提示操作就可众了。iOS7 Activation Bypass ...
Just getting caught up? Check out results for pitchers, catchers, first basemen, second basemen, third basemen, shortstops, and left fielders.
网烧饼哥加速器
Embed from Getty Images
I chose this picture deliberately. It’s from my favorite season of Barry Bonds’ career, 1993, when he transformed the San Francisco Giants from a 90-loss team into one that won 103 games. Even though he wasn’t yet 30, Bonds won his third National League Most Valuable Player Award that season and also reached 60 Wins Above Replacement.
There are fans — and still many voting members of the Baseball Writers Association of America — who will look at Bonds alleged use of performance enhancing drugs following the 1998 season and conclude it invalidates anything that came before or after. To me, though, Bonds was a Hall of Famer before. And to be honest, I prefer the lithe version of Bonds who could hit for average and power, run, and play lock-down left field.
Today, Bonds heads up a poll sure to irk some readers. Last month, via the survey website Qualtrics, I had 425 respondents vote on 10 players at each position, from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving. Having previously presented results for pitchers, catchers, iphone如何上谷歌, second basemen, third basemen, and shortstops, today focuses on left fielders.
Q7 – Rank the following left fielders, ranging from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving
Player
Average ranking
Barry Bonds
2.61
Shoeless Joe Jackson
3.40
Manny Ramirez
4.51
Albert Belle
4.74
Lance Berkman
4.81
Minnie Minoso
5.27
ios用什么上谷歌
6.44
Charlie Keller
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
Sherry Magee
7.49
Bobby Veach
8.85
[From a survey of 425 respondents, fielded via Qualtrics]
Early on in the voting, Shoeless Joe Jackson was actually beating Bonds by a narrow margin, which seems absurd to me. Conspiring to throw the 1919 World Series seems worse to me than steroid use, but other factors could be helping Jackson’s case. The passage of time and films like “Field of Dreams” and “Eight Men Out” have probably eased public rancor a bit. Other factors are likely at work, too — more about what they might be in a moment.
First, as always, here’s a more detailed breakdown of how people voted:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Belle
16
35
71
99
85
40
23
24
20
12
Berkman
8
37
49
84
103
85
35
12
8
4
Bonds
299
38
8
5
5
2
2
4
14
48
Jackson
74
165
60
38
22
6
4
9
6
41
iphone上如何使用谷歌
2
4
8
25
61
111
125
55
23
11
Keller
3
3
17
21
32
59
113
126
37
14
Magee
1
7
10
16
38
36
56
106
122
33
Minoso
19
35
56
84
48
55
32
22
64
10
Ramirez
2
99
142
43
23
12
7
18
53
26
Veach
1
2
4
10
8
19
28
49
78
226
Total
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
I’m struck, first of all, to see Bonds and Jackson each so favorably rated. I had expected more ninth and tenth-place votes for each man. Instead, filters via the survey website that I used for this project, Qualtrics, tell me that 187 of 425 voters had Bonds and Jackson in their top two choices. Almost two-thirds of voters included Bonds and Jackson in their top four.
Bonds suffered a little as well with other voters who might seemingly be sympathetic. Among them:
The 131 voters who ranked Rose as most-deserving among third basemen were more likely to favor Shoeless Joe, giving Jackson an average ranking of 2.44 against 2.82 for Bonds. Bonds also did slightly worse with these voters than his 2.61 overall average;
269 of the 313 voters who ranked Clemens as most-deserving among pitchers named Bonds the most-deserving left fielder, giving him an average ranking of 1.37. Of the other 44 voters, here’s how the first-place votes went: 31 for Jackson; six for another of my favorite candidates, Minnie Minoso; five for Albert Belle; and two for Charlie Keller.
The 202 voters who ranked Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmeiro fourth or better gave Bonds an average ranking of 4.02 and Jackson an average ranking of 3.27.
Just three of the 41 voters who thought Curt Schilling the top pitcher overall ranked Jackson ninth or tenth. Twenty-three of these voters ranked Bonds as such. (Granted, Bonds did far better with the 211 voters who ranked Schilling second, with Bonds rating an average of 1.56 with these voters as opposed to 6.59 among those who rated Schilling first.)
Perhaps there’s a case to be made that, on balance, Jackson is a better Hall of Fame candidate than Bonds. Jackson hit .356, third-best lifetime. Babe Ruth is said to have copied his swing. Jackson also played for a World Series-winning team, the 1917 Chicago White Sox, unlike Bonds. And perhaps those who favor Jackson believe he was innocent of throwing the 1919 World Series, though evidence exists otherwise. I wonder as well if racial bias is hurting Bonds here, though I’m not confident enough of this to make a detailed argument.
Still, I don’t see the case for Jackson over Bonds. Even just comparing both players through their first 13 seasons — the length of Jackson’s career and the number of years Bonds is believed to have played clean — the sabermetric chasm is too wide. After all, Bonds racked up 74.5 Wins Above Average for these seasons, while Jackson was good for 40.2. I generally see 30-40 Wins Above Average as a good benchmark for Hall of Fame candidates I’d enshrine on the basis of sabermetrics. To me at least, a clean Bonds was an arguable Hall of Famer better than Jackson.
That said, thanks again to everyone who’s been reading along. We’ll finish up with center field and right field on Monday and Tuesday respectively.
安卓苹果广告篇：屏蔽软件启动页和软件内广告 | 闲一鱼博客:2021-6-15 · 现在不管是什么软件，都会加入各种广告，比如软件启动就会显示一个广告，需要等待几秒才能进入软件，或者手动去点击跳过。还有各种软件内的广告，比如我伔用小说软件看小说就会弹出各种广告，严重影响阅读体验。安卓和苹果在这方面都非常恶心，这里闲鱼给大家说说如何屏蔽软件启动页和 ...iphone如何上谷歌, catchers, first basemen, second basemen, third basemen and iphone如何上谷歌. Stay tuned in the days to come for results of the other two positions.
Derek Jeter’s time approaches. In just a few months, the 14-time All Star and New York Yankees great will debut on the Baseball Writers Association of America’s ballot for Cooperstown. The only question at this point, really, is if Jeter can duplicate teammate Mariano Rivera’s unanimous induction with the writers.
Given Jeter’s underwhelming 72.4 WAR lifetime and porous defense according to sabermetrics (-243 defensive runs worse than average, lowest in baseball history), a few writers might withhold votes to make a statement. Still, Jeter will undoubtedly be close, if not unanimous. He nails the Fame part of Hall of Fame as well as few players of his generation.
Unsurprisingly, Jeter also heads up the latest round of results for my survey on the most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame. As a reminder, I recently asked 425 respondents to rank 10 players at each position, from 1 for most-deserving of induction to 10 for least-deserving. Previous results have focused on pitchers, catchers, first basemen, ios用什么上谷歌, and third basemen. (As a disclaimer, I put Alex Rodriguez at third base for the survey. More about my rationale can be found in the third base results post.)
Here’s how voting for shortstops went.
Q6 – Rank the following shortstops, ranging from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving
Player
苹果7上谷歌加速软件
Derek Jeter
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
Dave Concepcion
ios用什么上谷歌
iphone如何上谷歌
4.61
Omar Vizquel
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
Bill Dahlen
4.98
Mark Belanger
5.92
Jack Glasscock
6.52
Maury Wills
6.70
Marty Marion
7.63
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
8.36
[From a survey of 425 respondents, fielded via Qualtrics]
Sabermetrically, these might be some of the least-inspiring results in the bunch. Jeter’s long had his detractors. Concepcion, who’s come moderately close on the veterans’ ballot for Cooperstown in recent years, doesn’t have any advanced stats to write home about either. Nor does Vizquel, who’s already crossed 40 percent on the writers’ ballot and looks destined for future induction. Meanwhile, Bill Dahlen, whose case is built around a re-examining of his career on the strength of his 75.4 WAR, is a ways down here.
As always, here’s a more detailed breakdown of how people voted:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Belanger
10
22
44
59
70
57
49
26
29
59
Cncpcn.
19
74
89
85
79
39
21
12
4
3
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
19
84
37
34
50
68
76
31
14
12
Grcprra.
4
54
72
100
66
63
31
18
8
9
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
7
21
43
24
29
47
80
92
47
35
Jeter
340
29
22
7
4
10
2
2
1
8
Marion
2
6
9
11
30
37
58
112
116
44
Travis
0
6
7
13
15
21
35
69
122
137
Vizquel
15
103
68
52
40
46
26
16
40
19
Wills
9
26
34
40
42
37
47
47
44
99
Total
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
A few thoughts based on these numbers:
That 391 of 425 voters rated Jeter a 3 or better here is one more sign to me he’ll sail into Cooperstown. But the scattering of lower votes hints to me that Jeter might not be unanimous. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.
I’m also struck to see the wide chasm in votes between Dahlen and Jack Glasscock, with nearly twice as many voters ranking Dahlen in the top five. By Wins Above Average, which might be a fairer measure for 19th century players than WAR since the seasons were shorter, Dahlen and Glasscock are fairly even players.
Of the 34 respondents who voted Jeter a 4 or worse, Belanger, Concepcion, and Vizquel got the most first-place votes, with eight, seven, and five respectively. Don’t ask me how these things work.
Cecil Travis is the only player of the 90 in this survey to receive zero first-place votes. He’s one of my favorite Hall of Fame candidates, essentially sacrificing his career to serve nearly four full seasons in World War II, seeing combat and suffering frostbite on his feet at the Battle of the Bulge. Cooperstown wouldn’t be any worse for his inclusion.
Anyhow, that’s all for now. Tune in tomorrow for the results of left field.
Just getting caught up? Check out results for pitchers, catchers, first basemen, second basemen, and third basemen. Stay tuned in the days to come for results of the other three positions.
The most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame: Third basemen
But then Beltre signed with the Red Sox and then, following a brief stint in Boston, the Rangers. Playing in two of baseball’s best hitters’ parks, the rest is, as the saying goes, history. Beltre hit .307 over his final nine seasons, finished with 3,166 hits and 477 home runs, and he’ll more than likely be a first-ballot Hall of Famer.
Today, Beltre heads up his position for a survey I fielded recently, asking 425 respondents to rank 10 players at each position, from 1 for most-deserving of induction to 10 for least-deserving. Having previously presented results for pitchers, catchers, iphone上如何使用谷歌 and second basemen, today focuses on third base.
Q5 – Rank the following third basemen, ranging from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving
Player
Average ranking
Adrian Beltre
3.07
iphone如何上谷歌
3.50
Alex Rodriguez
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
苹果7上谷歌加速软件
4.55
Dick Allen
iphone上如何使用谷歌
Scott Rolen
5.63
Graig Nettles
ios用什么上谷歌
Buddy Bell
7.35
ios用什么上谷歌
7.39
Darrell Evans
7.65
[From a survey of 425 respondents, fielded via Qualtrics]
As always, lots to unpack here. I’ll start by explaining the presence of a few players in the results. Alex Rodriguez technically played more games at shortstop and racked up more WAR at the position. But he was last an everyday shortstop in 2003 and spent more years as a third baseman. So it seemed more appropriate to me to put him at third base for this. I realized after voting started that it would’ve been interesting to have Rodriguez and Derek Jeter face off at shortstop. Oh well.
I maybe should’ve employed the same logic I used with Rodriguez with Dick Allen, who had a few superb years at third base early in his career before transitioning to first base. Still, space was tight on the ballot for first base so Allen wound up here. As for Pete Rose, who played a bunch of different positions, he had to go somewhere for this project and had some fine years in the mid-1970s at third base.
One interesting and probably unsurprising thing to note about Rose and Rodriguez is that they each drew far more first-place votes than Beltre or second-place finisher for this position, Miguel Cabrera. But Rose and Rodriguez each drew so many ninth and tenth-place votes that it dragged down their averages.
A more detailed breakdown of the voting is as follows:
The 131 voters who rated Rose first gave Rodriguez an average ranking of 4.82.
The 172 voters who rated Rodriguez first gave Rose an average ranking of 5.20.
The 113 voters who rated Rose last gave Rodriguez an average ranking of 4.16.
The 44 voters who rated Rodriguez last gave Rose an average ranking of 2.77.
苹果和谷歌公布COVID-19暴露通知应用的界面细节 - Apple ...:2021-5-5 · 苹果和谷歌周一向全球公共卫生机构提供了新的资源，帮助他伔制作COVID-19暴露通知应用，包括iOS和Android的用户界面示例和伕码示例。iOS13.5系统将在 ...
Other thoughts: There’s a pretty clear divide in the results after Rolen, though it wouldn’t be an awful day for Cooperstown if ever Graig Nettles, Buddy Bell, Ken Boyer, or Darrell Evans is enshrined. I wouldn’t be stunned to see Nettles or Boyer get inducted at some point, but Bell and Evans probably have long-term spots locked down in these sorts of projects.
It’d be nice to get more third basemen on the ballot in the future. Robin Ventura has a reasonably good case sabermetrically. So does Ron Cey. Bill Madlock doesn’t have the advanced stats to bolster his case, but he won four batting titles. Then there’s Clete Boyer, one of the best defensive third basemen in baseball history. At some point, Nolan Arenado might deserve a spot, too.
Anyhow, I’ll share results for shortstop tomorrow. Thanks again to everyone for reading so far.
被苹果谷歌应用商店下架后 Zynn已推出无现金奖励的替伕版本 ...:今天 · 五月份的时候，翻版“抖音”的短视频应用Zynn凭借现金奖励迅速拉拢了一大票用户，并且在苹果AppStore和谷歌Play应用商店榜单上力压TikTok。然而火 ...pitchers, catchers, first basemen, and second basemen. Stay tuned in the days to come for results of the other four positions.
The most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame: Second basemen
Embed from Getty Images
One of the greatest Hall of Fame injustices in recent years, in my book, occurred two years ago with the ballot for the Modern Baseball Era Committee.
Times could be changing. With Trammell having made a plug for his former double play partner in his induction speech and Whitaker eligible for consideration again this fall, perhaps he’s due for his moment. But results that follow hint that there still might be some conversation needed around Whitaker’s case.
As a refresher for anyone new, I recently conducted a survey via the website Qualtrics, asking people to rank 10 players at each position, from 1 for most-deserving of induction to 10 for least-deserving. Having previously shared results for pitchers, catchers, and first basemen, it’s my pleasure to now share results for second base.
Q4 – Rank the following second basemen, ranging from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving
There’s a lot to unpack here. Once again, I’m struck by the parity up top after the first position. Jeff Kent has struggled to gain any traction on the writers ballot, rising to 18.1 percent, his best showing thus far, in his sixth and most-recent appearance. It’s striking to see him outpace sabermetric favorite (and one of my personal favorite candidates) Bobby Grich. It’s also interesting to see Grich ranked in front of Chase Utley, his closest comp among ballplayers in recent years.
As for Whitaker, top showing and an average ranking of 2.83 would seemingly be cause for celebration among his supporters. Still, the breakdown of individual voting shows a couple things for Whitaker worth highlighting.
The 60 voters who ranked Kent first ranked Whitaker 4.52 on average.
This suggests to me that voters who appreciate Grich are also likely to appreciate Whitaker, which makes sense since it takes sabermetrics to appreciate each man’s case. What’s interesting to me is that Grich is also eligible with the Modern Era Baseball Committee this fall. I suspect he’ll be left off the ballot, since like Whitaker, he was one-and-done on the writers’ ballot and unlike Whitaker, Grich doesn’t have a recently-inducted teammate advocating publicly for him. In fact, Grich has yet to make a veterans’ ballot. But I wouldn’t be stunned if Grich’s absence from the ballot hurts Whitaker with a voter or two. They’re just too similar of candidates.
Looking at the remainder of the results, it’ll be interesting to see if this is Cano’s high-water mark as a candidate. Same for Dustin Pedroia. Both men look like their days as useful players could be behind them. I’m pleased to see Willie Randolph, another underrated player, doing relatively well in the votes here. Ross Barnes did about as well as an 1870s legend could be expected. As for Davey Lopes and Frank White, I might look to swap them out as candidates if I field this again in the future.
That said, I’ll share the results of third base tomorrow.
Just getting caught up? Check out results for ios用什么上谷歌, catchers, andfirst basemen. Stay tuned in the days to come for results of the other five positions.
iphone如何上谷歌
Embed from Getty Images
It’s my pleasure to present the third round of results, based on a survey of 425 respondents, for my nine-part series on the most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame. Having covered voting results for pitchers and catchers in the first two posts, today will focus on first basemen.
That said, let’s get right into it.
Q3 – Rank the following first basemen, ranging from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving
Player
Average ranking
Albert Pujols
1.66
Fred McGriff
4.68
Todd Helton
5.02
Mark McGwire
5.17
Keith Hernandez
5.95
Will Clark
6.04
Rafael Palmeiro
6.28
Don Mattingly
6.46
Gil Hodges
6.65
苹果7上谷歌加速软件
7.09
[From a survey of 425 respondents, fielded via Qualtrics]
Once more, no surprises at the very top of this. In fact, without giving too much away, I’ll note that Pujols got the most first-place votes of any candidate in this survey. Good. Had Pujols stayed in St. Louis following the 2011 season or at least signed with a team with a hitter-friendly ballpark, he might be nearing the all-time home run record now. We’ll never know how much Anaheim took away from his career numbers.
Looking at the other nine first basemen here, there’s again a fair bit of parity. Fred McGriff has some separation in the totals and looks like a probable Today’s Game Era Committee selection. Todd Helton and Mark McGwire might be heading down that track as well, though Helton could get a bump on the writers’ ballot if his former teammate Larry Walker is enshrined in the next few years. I’m less encouraged by the results for the rest of the bunch and wonder if, to some extent, they’re cancelling each other out.
That said, here’s a more detailed breakdown on the voting:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Clark
5
22
38
53
52
62
81
50
29
33
Garvey
5
20
27
26
27
47
66
50
66
91
ios用什么上谷歌
7
55
60
66
71
59
36
40
18
13
Hernandez
5
28
33
53
63
66
60
50
43
24
Hodges
11
28
31
30
38
39
42
82
68
56
Mattingly
8
23
31
31
55
46
58
75
64
34
McGriff
15
79
60
64
54
50
51
25
17
10
McGwire
16
100
70
46
19
19
12
29
76
38
iphone如何上谷歌
2
40
68
48
44
29
18
22
43
111
Pujols
351
30
7
8
2
8
1
2
1
15
Total
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
A few fun things to note in the voting, courtesy of filters from the survey website Qualtrics which I used to conduct this poll:
The 351 voters who rated Pujols first gave Clemens an average rating of 2.15, which was marginally better than his overall rating of 2.44 for this survey. The 74 voters who rated Pujols second or worse gave Clemens an average rating of 3.77.
The 223 voters who rated McGwire or Rafael Palmeiro third or better gave Clemens an average rating of 1.14. The 202 voters who rated McGwire or Palmeiro worse than third gave Clemens an average rating of 3.86.
The 44 voters who selected Keith Hernandez, Steve Garvey, Gil Hodges, Don Mattingly, or McGriff first gave Pujols an average rating of 4.66. They also gave Clemens an average rating of 5.07. I’ll share their thoughts on Barry Bonds when I post results for left fielders.
15 voters somehow rated Pujols last. I don’t know if they misread the survey and thought 10 was best. Whatever the case, these 15 voters were most likely to rate Will Clark or Garvey tops.
Anyhow, thanks to everyone for reading so far. I’ll be back tomorrow with the results for second base, which I think will make for the most interesting post thus far.
Just getting caught up? Check out results for pitchers怎么在苹果上登录谷歌catchers. Stay tuned in the days to come for results of the other six positions.
The most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame: Catchers
Embed from Getty Images
A few weeks ago, with the help of the survey website Qualtrics, I asked people to address a common Baseball Hall of Fame argument.
Often, when people talk about candidates, they’ll say that they’re okay with one going in but not before another. Accordingly, I created a survey with 10 players at each position, asking them to rank them from 1 for most-deserving of induction to 10 for least-deserving.
Voting wrapped at midnight on Aug. 1, with 425 responses in. Having debuted results for pitchers yesterday morning, it’s my pleasure to now unveil results for catchers. I will add, before we get into parsing the rankings, that while Thurman Munson didn’t finish top overall, I chose his picture to highlight this post because of the tragic death at 32 of the former New York Yankees’ captain in an airplane accident 40 years ago today.
Q2 – Rank the following catchers, ranging from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving
ios用什么上谷歌
Average ranking
Joe Mauer
3.42
Ted Simmons
4.15
Yadier Molina
怎么在苹果上登录谷歌
Buster Posey
4.54
Thurman Munson
4.64
Bill Freehan
5.90
Jorge Posada
6.11
Elston Howard
iphone如何上谷歌
Charlie Bennett
7.28
Gene Tenace
8.02
[From a survey of 425 respondents, fielded via Qualtrics]
Once again, I’m struck by the parity. After Joe Mauer, whose Hall of Fame case looks encouraging based on how he fared here, it’s a four-way battle between two of the best catchers of the 1970s, Ted Simmons and Thurman Munson, and two of the most-celebrated in the game today, Yadier Molina and Buster Posey. It’ll be interesting to see how long this debate persists, depending on how long it takes for Molina and Posey’s enshrinement. Simmons and Munson have long been debated in Cooperstown conversations.
Simmons’ results particularly strike me. Simba, the Posey of the ’70s in my book, got the most first-place votes. But he also got the fourth-most ninth place votes and just six fewer than Molina, Posey, Munson, and Mauer combined. Don’t ask me how these things work. The second half of Simmons’ career, when he went from a young standout backstop with the St. Louis Cardinals to an injury-riddled first baseman wasn’t great. But Molina, Posey, Munson, and Mauer all experienced declines after their 30th birthdays as well. And if I’m making an all-time Cardinals team, Simmons is my catcher over Molina any day of the week.
I’m a little bummed to see that once again, a couple of sabermetric favorite candidates fared poorly here. Yesterday, I was noting the dismal rankings for Rick Reuschel and Wes Ferrell. Today, it appears that word still hasn’t gotten out on Tenace, one of the best offensive catchers in baseball history by OPS+ or Bennett, one of the premier catchers of the 19th century before he lost his legs in a train accident.
That said, I thank everyone for reading so far and will post the results for first basemen on Monday.
The most-deserving players not in the Hall of Fame: Pitchers
Embed from Getty Images
A few weeks ago, I kicked off a challenge here.
With the help of the survey website Qualtrics, I asked people to go position by position and rank the most-deserving players not in the Baseball Hall of Fame, ranging from 1 for most-deserving to 10 for least-deserving. I gave a list of 10 players at each position, based primarily on who I thought voters would expect to be in the poll.
Q1 – Rank the following pitchers, ranging from 1 for most-deserving of Hall of Fame induction to 10 for least-deserving
iphone上如何使用谷歌
ios用什么上谷歌
Roger Clemens
2.44
Curt Schilling
3.50
Kevin Brown
5.29
David Cone
5.52
iphone如何上谷歌
5.55
iphone上如何使用谷歌
5.56
Luis Tiant
5.68
Jim Kaat
5.92
Wes Ferrell
7.60
Rick Reuschel
7.94
[From a survey of 425 respondents, fielded via Qualtrics]
No real surprises at the top, I suppose. Opposition has cooled considerably in recent years toward enshrining Clemens, a brilliant pitcher long before rumors of performance enhancing drug use surfaced. He drew 59.5 percent of the vote in his most recent appearance on the writers’ ballot for Cooperstown. I suspect he will reach the necessary 75 percent sometime in his remaining three years of eligibility. The ballot just isn’t that strong over the next few years.
Looking at the names below, Curt Schilling is probably moving toward enshrinement. I’m struck by the parity between Kevin Brown and Jim Kaat. I’m a little bummed to see Wes Ferrell and Rick Reuschel anchoring the list, though it’s not stunning. I put Ferrell and Reuschel in the survey partly in tribute to my friend and fellow baseball researcher Adam Darowski, who has advocated heavily for their induction in recent years, though each has a nuanced case that could be overlooked in a quick survey. That said, if I field this again in the future, I’ll probably sub in Justin Verlander and Max Scherzer for Ferrell and Reuschel.
I should add that unlike most of the other positions in this survey, it was difficult to get the list of pitchers down to 10 names. I contemplated going 15 names just for pitchers, but thought it would look too out of sync with the rest of the survey. That said, here are some names I wanted to put in but didn’t have space for this time: Verlander, Johan Santana, Dave Stieb, Andy Pettitte, Orel Hershiser, and Dwight Gooden.
For anyone who cares, here’s a more detailed breakdown of the votes each pitcher received for each ranking.
The 41 voters who ranked Schilling first ranked Clemens eighth-worst among the field, ahead of only Wes Ferrell and Rick Reuschel, with an average ranking for Clemens of 7.00.
The 38 voters who gave Roger Clemens a ranking of 10 ranked Curt Schilling top, at 3.63 on average, followed by Tommy John at 4.18, and Luis Tiant at 4.24. I’m struck again by the level of parity in this survey after Clemens. Were there a clear consensus, someone would be closer to 1 here.
The 43 voters who ranked Tommy John, Jim Kaat, or Luis Tiant top overall gave Clemens an average ranking of 6.74, again ahead of only Ferrell and Reuschel.
I’ll get into comparisons for Clemens with some of the other controversial candidates in this survey (Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, Shoeless Joe Jackson, and Pete Rose) as I get to those results posts. There are some interesting findings to highlight along these lines as we get there.